Why Britain needs a digital ID system

Open the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, picks her favorite stories in this week’s newsletter.

Surprisingly for other countries in Europe, very few issues in Britain cause controversy as a way of identifying the country. Critics have long criticized ID cards as a path to an Orwellian state. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously rejected a proposal by his Labor government to introduce ID cards to control immigration. But as Britain tries to rebuild and reform its broken public services, despite the conflicts and challenges, it would make sense to include digital systems in the plans.

Digital IDs have many advantages over traditional photo cards. In many cases including digital identification and personal details and biometric information, it can be used to simplify access to public services, and to connect with private businesses. They can be expanded to store official documents, qualifications, membership cards and become a digital wallet. Estonia, the pioneer of the “e-state” that its citizens can use e-IDs in everything from ordering registrations to voting, they pretend that the system saves 2 percent of GDP a year. Some countries like AustraliaSingapore is Italy have implemented digital IDs, either free or compulsory.

Britain’s e-ID could boost public service reform – helping, for example, to integrate personal health records with patient information and improve health care payments. The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, a think tank founded by the former Prime Minister (a long-time ID supporter), comparison such a policy could improve public finances by around £2bn per year, mainly by reducing profit fraud and improving tax collection, on top of the huge economic benefits. It accounts for a voluntary, partly government-built – but low- Single Entry The aid to allow a person to enter one place to the public service, can be implemented within one term of the parliament and 90 percent of the citizens can apply.

A functional digital ID can prevent document searches when opening bank accounts or buying a home, and help prevent theft. Supporters argue a national information system would also help reduce “small boat” migrants crossing the Channel. Anecdotal evidence shows that one of the main draws in the UK is the idea that the lack of IDs makes it easier to disappear into the gray economy than many of its European counterparts. Requiring an e-ID to get benefits and housing can be frustrating for undocumented immigrants and people-smuggling criminals.

There are many reasons to be cautious. Improving technology is important because of concerns about data privacy and the risk of hacking and cyber attacks. Britain has a terrible record in government IT – think of the Post Office Horizon scandal. Some within Labor argue the digital ID plan is too complicated and too political to add to the burden of rebuilding already run-down and underfunded jobs. Others are scarred by the crisis that destroyed the post-9/11 policy that was introduced, in the best economic times, by the Blair government.

But there are many working practices elsewhere that Britain can learn from or copy. Many government IT services are very old so it is important to try to jump to the next generation technology, as Estonia did in the 1990s. Privacy arguments have little power when most adults happily carry smartphones loaded with software that can monitor everything from how many steps they take to what kind of socks they buy.

Although critics are still vocal, a YouGov poll last year found that more than half UK authorities supported compulsory ID cards. The UK e-ID may require some discussion and negotiation. It wouldn’t be easy. But if Britain really wants a modern world, it is an idea whose moment has come.