Generative AI is my research and writing partner, should I disclose it?

“If I use an AI tool for research or to help create something, do I have to cite it as a source in my finished work?How do you properly attribute AI tools when you use them? are you?”

— Quote Finder

Dear Quote,

The simple answer is if you use generative AI Disclosure is probably not necessary for research purposes, however, attribution is probably required if you use ChatGPT: or other AI tool for composition.

Whenever you feel ethically conflicted about disclosing your engagement with artificial intelligence softwareHere are two guiding questions I think you should ask yourself. And maybe the recipient of this AI assisted compositing feel lost if the tools turn out to be synthetic instead of organic. Of course, these questions may not fit every situation perfectly, and academics certainly have a higher standard when it comes to proper citations, however, I fully believe that taking five minutes can help you understand proper usage and avoid unnecessary headaches.

Distinguishing between research and composition is an important first step if I use generative AI as a type unreliable encyclopedia which may direct me to other sources or expand my view on the subject, but not as part of the actual writing, I think it’s less problematic and less likely to smell like a scam.Always double-check any facts you come across in chatbot outputs and never link to ChatGPT output or Confusion page as the primary source of truth. Many chatbots can now connect to external sources on the web, so you can click to read more.Think of it, in this context, as part of the information infrastructure the destination must be an external link.

Let’s say you decide to use a chatbot to outline the first draft, or create a text/images/audio/video to blend yours in. In this case, I think it’s smart to err on the side of disclosure. Even the Uber Eats app cheese sticks now include a disclaimer that the food description was generated by AI and may list inaccurate ingredients.

Whenever you use artificial intelligence for creation, and in some cases for research, you have to deal with a second question: Basically, ask yourself, will the reader or viewer feel cheated when they find out later? parts of the experience were created by AI. If so, you should absolutely use proper attribution explaining how you used the tool out of respect for your audience. Creating parts of this column is not will only be against it WIRED’s Policyit would also just be a dry and unfun experience for both of us.

By considering the people who are going to enjoy your work and your intentions for creating it, you can add context to your use of AI work email generated by AI and proofread by you is probably fine. However, using generative artificial intelligence to compose a condolence letter after a death would be an example of insensitivity, and something actually happened. If the person on the other end of the conversation wants to connect with you on a personal, emotional level, consider closing the ChatGPT browser tab and logging out. notebook and pen.

“How can educators teach teenagers how to use AI tools responsibly and ethically? Do the benefits of AI outweigh the threats?”

– Raised hand